Social movements boosted online orders for US Black-owned restaurants after the murder of George Floyd

Written by on November 11, 2024


  • Becker, G. S. A theory of social interactions. J. Polit. Econ. 82, 1063–1093 (1974).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Andreoni, J. Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Polit. Econ. 97, 1447–1458 (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DellaVigna, S., List, J. A. & Malmendier, U. Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Q. J. Econ. 127, 1–56 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCarthy, J. D. & Zald, M. N. Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory. Am. J. Sociol. 82, 1212–1241 (1977).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klandermans, B. Mobilization and participation: social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49, 583–600 (1984).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oegema, D. & Klandermans, B. Why social movement sympathizers don’t participate: erosion and nonconversion of support. Am. Sociol. Rev. 59, 703–722 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dunivin, Z. O., Yan, H. Y., Ince, J. & Rojas, F. Black Lives Matter protests shift public discourse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117320119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eichstaedt, J. C. et al. The emotional and mental health impact of the murder of George Floyd on the US population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2109139118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gillion, D. Q. The Political Power of Protest: Minority Activism and Shifts in Public Policy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381277

  • Wasow, O. Agenda seeding: how 1960s black protests moved elites, public opinion and voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 114, 638–659 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mutz, D. C. Effects of changes in perceived discrimination during BLM on the 2020 presidential election. Sci. Adv. 8, 9140 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hoffman, M. Does higher income make you more altruistic? Evidence from the Holocaust. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93, 876–887 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R. & Keltner, D. Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3489–3494 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gray, G. L. Brewing Outrage: The Role of Racial Sympathy in Shaping the Political Response to Police Shootings. PhD diss., Howard Univ. (2020).

  • Teeselink, B. K., Melios, G. Weather to protest: the effect of Black Lives Matter protests on the 2020 presidential election. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3809877 (2021).

  • Fan, J. S. Woke capital: the role of corporations in social movements. Harv. Bus. Law Rev. 9, 441–494 (2019); https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/586

  • Aneja A., Reshef, O. & Luca, M. The Benefits of Revealing Race: Evidence from Minority-Owned Local Businesses Working Paper No. 30932 (NBER, 2024); https://doi.org/10.3386/w30932

  • Madestam, A., Shoag, D., Veuger, S. & Yanagizawa-Drott, D. Do political protests matter? Evidence from the Tea Party movement. Q. J. Econ. 128, 1633–1686 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown, J. & Sheridan, B. J. The impact of National Anthem protests on National Football League television ratings. J. Sports Econ. 21, 829–847 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zion, A. & Hollmann, T. Food delivery apps: usage and demographics—winners, losers and laggards. Zion and Zion https://www.zionandzion.com/research/food-delivery-apps-usage-and-demographics-winners-losers-and-laggards/ (2019).

  • Sperling, N. & Vandegrift, D. Anthem protests, viewer politics, and the demand for NFL games: assessing the impact of National Anthem protests on viewership. J. Sports Econ. 23, 1017–1045 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Chaisemartin, C. & D’Haultfœuille, X. Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 110, 2964–2996 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baker, A. C., Larcker, D. F. & Wang, C. C. Y. How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financ. Econ. 144, 370–395 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goodman-Bacon, A. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econ. 225, 254–277 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cengiz, D., Dube, A., Lindner, A. & Zipperer, B. The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs. Q. J. Econ. 134, 1405–1454 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohn, J. B., Liu, Z. & Wardlaw, M. I. Count (and count-like) data in finance. J. Financ. Econ. 146, 529–551 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, J. & Roth, J. Logs with zeros? Some problems and solutions. Q. J. Econ. 139, 891–936 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mullahy, J. & Norton, E. C. Why Transform Y? A Critical Assessment of Dependent-Variable Transformations in Regression Models for Skewed and Sometimes-Zero Outcomes. Working Paper No. 30735 (NBER, 2022); https://doi.org/10.3386/w30735



  • Source link


    Reader's opinions

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



    Current track

    Title

    Artist