Categories: International News

Civil Activists Advise Parliamentary Committee to Seek Answers from Government, Not International Human Rights Bodies | Ratopati

Kathmandu. Civil activists and human rights defenders have suggested that the parliamentary committee seek answers from the government, not from international human rights organizations, regarding the claim that political pressure is being exerted on Supreme Court judges. This suggestion comes after the House of Representatives’ Law, Justice, and Human Rights Committee directed the government to seek clarification from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) following a joint statement issued by these organizations. Civil activists expressed their objection to the committee’s decision in a joint statement issued on Thursday. Signatories to the statement include Sushil Poudel, Charan Prasai, Subodhraj Poudel, Gopal Krishna Shiwakoti, Dinesh Tripathi, Raju Chapagain, Indu Tuladhar, Vijayraj Gautam, Shobhakar Budhathoki, Dr. Vidya Chapagain, Som Niroula, Bikash Basnet, Sushil Bicke, Gopi Parajuli, Kapil Aryal, Biswas Nepali, Bhagawati Adhikari, Vishnu Shripali, Monica Niroula, Rekha Shrestha, Balkumari Darmi, Bhakta Bishwakarma, Nitu Pokharel, Shyamkumari Saha, Sirjana Pun Magar, Lubhraj Neupane, Abhayraj Joshi, Dhan Bahadur Mijar, and Abhishek Adhikari.

The statement mentions that according to Article 97 of the Constitution of Nepal and Rule 173 of the House of Representatives Regulations, 2083, the primary role of parliamentary committees is to assist in the functioning of the federal parliament, monitor and evaluate the activities of the government and relevant state bodies, and ensure that the government is accountable and responsible to the parliament.

‘The basis for calling parliamentary committees ‘mini parliaments’ is to maintain continuous and effective parliamentary oversight over the executive,’ the statement reads. ‘Similarly, the mandate of the Law, Justice, and Human Rights Committee cannot be interpreted as having the authority to bring independent international human rights organizations, which question the government’s activities, under parliamentary control or accountability.’

Black Hot Fire Network Team

BHFN Editorial Team covers breaking news, culture, and global developments impacting Black America, Africa, Kenya, and the African diaspora. Focused on timely reporting and community-driven perspectives, the team delivers news, analysis, and stories that inform, connect, and amplify diverse voices.

Recent Posts

OSCE trains over 650 police cadets in Serbia on responding to violence against women and girls

From 8 to 12 September 2025, in Sremska Kamenica (Serbia), the OSCE Transnational Threats Department/Strategic…

1 month ago

Ethiopian Delegation Participates in Eastern Africa Standby Force Policy Organs Meeting – ENA English

Addis Ababa, August 14, 2026 (ENA) — An Ethiopian delegation is participating in the Ministerial…

1 month ago

Supreme Court Says Negligence Suits Against Military Contractor Operating in a Combat Zone Are Not Preempted

On April 22, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case Hencely v. Fluor Corp.…

1 month ago

Wetang’ula directs probe into crypto firm’s Kenya operations

The National Assembly Finance and National Planning Committee has been directed to investigate the operations…

1 month ago

Ruto tells young performers: You could be Kenya’s next global star

President William Ruto with his deputy Kithure Kindiki and first lady Rachel Ruto during the…

1 month ago

Health summit 2026 and Duale’s icing on cake

Health CS Aden Duale A press briefing dubbed ‘ask your government anything on healthcare’…

1 month ago