Categories: International News

Civil Activists Advise Parliamentary Committee to Seek Answers from Government, Not International Human Rights Bodies | Ratopati

Kathmandu. Civil activists and human rights defenders have suggested that the parliamentary committee seek answers from the government, not from international human rights organizations, regarding the claim that political pressure is being exerted on Supreme Court judges. This suggestion comes after the House of Representatives’ Law, Justice, and Human Rights Committee directed the government to seek clarification from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) following a joint statement issued by these organizations. Civil activists expressed their objection to the committee’s decision in a joint statement issued on Thursday. Signatories to the statement include Sushil Poudel, Charan Prasai, Subodhraj Poudel, Gopal Krishna Shiwakoti, Dinesh Tripathi, Raju Chapagain, Indu Tuladhar, Vijayraj Gautam, Shobhakar Budhathoki, Dr. Vidya Chapagain, Som Niroula, Bikash Basnet, Sushil Bicke, Gopi Parajuli, Kapil Aryal, Biswas Nepali, Bhagawati Adhikari, Vishnu Shripali, Monica Niroula, Rekha Shrestha, Balkumari Darmi, Bhakta Bishwakarma, Nitu Pokharel, Shyamkumari Saha, Sirjana Pun Magar, Lubhraj Neupane, Abhayraj Joshi, Dhan Bahadur Mijar, and Abhishek Adhikari.

The statement mentions that according to Article 97 of the Constitution of Nepal and Rule 173 of the House of Representatives Regulations, 2083, the primary role of parliamentary committees is to assist in the functioning of the federal parliament, monitor and evaluate the activities of the government and relevant state bodies, and ensure that the government is accountable and responsible to the parliament.

‘The basis for calling parliamentary committees ‘mini parliaments’ is to maintain continuous and effective parliamentary oversight over the executive,’ the statement reads. ‘Similarly, the mandate of the Law, Justice, and Human Rights Committee cannot be interpreted as having the authority to bring independent international human rights organizations, which question the government’s activities, under parliamentary control or accountability.’

Black Hot Fire Network Team

BHFN Editorial Team covers breaking news, culture, and global developments impacting Black America, Africa, Kenya, and the African diaspora. Focused on timely reporting and community-driven perspectives, the team delivers news, analysis, and stories that inform, connect, and amplify diverse voices.

Recent Posts

SARB MPC’s newest member on policy, risks and resilience

ShareSaveSouth Africa's monetary policy outlook remains in focus as the country's newest member of the…

18 minutes ago

Trump Administration Refunds About $100 Billion After Supreme Court Strikes Down Tariffs | Ukraine news

After a major court ruling, a massive payment process moved quietly through the government, raising…

48 minutes ago

Special Needs learners call for inclusive learning at Kenya Music Festival

Audio By Vocalize Kedowa Special School for the Deaf perform during Kenya Music Festival…

7 hours ago

“Resource Curse” revisited – The political economy of nationalised oil and minerals in Africa

John Quinn‘s Majority State Ownership of Oil and Mining Sectors in Africa examines how nationalising…

8 hours ago

Law Minister Criticizes International Human Rights Organizations’ Statements on Nepal’s Sovereignty | Ratopati

Kathmandu. Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Sobita Gautam has expressed objection to the recent…

8 hours ago

Kenya’s private sector growth hits 6-month high as economy recovers

Employees at an apparel firm in Kenya at workKenya's private sector returned to growth in …

8 hours ago