Categories: International News

Civil Activists Advise Parliamentary Committee to Seek Answers from Government, Not International Human Rights Bodies | Ratopati

Kathmandu. Civil activists and human rights defenders have suggested that the parliamentary committee seek answers from the government, not from international human rights organizations, regarding the claim that political pressure is being exerted on Supreme Court judges. This suggestion comes after the House of Representatives’ Law, Justice, and Human Rights Committee directed the government to seek clarification from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) following a joint statement issued by these organizations. Civil activists expressed their objection to the committee’s decision in a joint statement issued on Thursday. Signatories to the statement include Sushil Poudel, Charan Prasai, Subodhraj Poudel, Gopal Krishna Shiwakoti, Dinesh Tripathi, Raju Chapagain, Indu Tuladhar, Vijayraj Gautam, Shobhakar Budhathoki, Dr. Vidya Chapagain, Som Niroula, Bikash Basnet, Sushil Bicke, Gopi Parajuli, Kapil Aryal, Biswas Nepali, Bhagawati Adhikari, Vishnu Shripali, Monica Niroula, Rekha Shrestha, Balkumari Darmi, Bhakta Bishwakarma, Nitu Pokharel, Shyamkumari Saha, Sirjana Pun Magar, Lubhraj Neupane, Abhayraj Joshi, Dhan Bahadur Mijar, and Abhishek Adhikari.

The statement mentions that according to Article 97 of the Constitution of Nepal and Rule 173 of the House of Representatives Regulations, 2083, the primary role of parliamentary committees is to assist in the functioning of the federal parliament, monitor and evaluate the activities of the government and relevant state bodies, and ensure that the government is accountable and responsible to the parliament.

‘The basis for calling parliamentary committees ‘mini parliaments’ is to maintain continuous and effective parliamentary oversight over the executive,’ the statement reads. ‘Similarly, the mandate of the Law, Justice, and Human Rights Committee cannot be interpreted as having the authority to bring independent international human rights organizations, which question the government’s activities, under parliamentary control or accountability.’

Black Hot Fire Network Team

BHFN Editorial Team covers breaking news, culture, and global developments impacting Black America, Africa, Kenya, and the African diaspora. Focused on timely reporting and community-driven perspectives, the team delivers news, analysis, and stories that inform, connect, and amplify diverse voices.

Recent Posts

Political fragmentation set to reshape South Africa’s metros, says analyst Richard Calland

South Africa’s political climate is marked by cracks that could lead to a wider spread…

1 hour ago

Kenyan national record-holder provisionally suspended for doping

In October, the Anti-Doping Agency of Kenya (ADAK) quietly released its new list of provisionally…

1 hour ago

Nigeria Must Not Export Data Like Crude Oil, NITDA DG Warns as Kano Unveils Digital Economy Plans

DG NITDA Mal Kashifu Inuwa Nigeria Must Not Export Data Like Crude Oil, NITDA DG…

1 hour ago

This Black-Owned Furniture Business Enables Community Collaboration

For over 21 years, Hans Edwards and his managing partner and co-founder Tony Hill have…

1 hour ago

‘Black Panther III’ Will Hit IMAX Screens, Including Rare Giant-Format Film Theaters as Release Date is Confirmed

Ryan Coogler has never been shy about chasing the biggest image possible. His horror hit…

2 hours ago

National Employment Equity Council, Amnesty International Canada and parliamentarians urge Alberta to drop Bill 33’s equity restrictions

OTTAWA, Ontario, Nov. 04, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The National Employment Equity Council (NEC) and…

3 hours ago