Kenya’s Circular Economy Faces Challenges Amid Aid Reduction
Written by Black Hot Fire Network Team on February 25, 2026
Kenya’s efforts to develop a sustainable and resource-efficient economy are encountering challenges due to a reduction in funding from global development partners. This shift impacts grants and concessional financing previously used to support climate and waste management initiatives.
Venkat Kotamaraju, Partner & Director (Circular Economy and Climate Solutions) at Intellecap Advisory Services, has cautioned that global grant capital is becoming less reliable for climate and waste enterprises in Africa. He suggests that Kenya must now leverage domestic capital sources, including pension funds, commercial banks, and local investors, to address the emerging funding gap.
Funding Challenges and Shifts
Global development partners are scaling back funding, leading to a decrease in grants and concessional financing for climate and waste projects in Kenya. This reduction is attributed to cuts and reprioritizations in donor markets, including the United States. Kotamaraju describes this shift as structural rather than cyclical. He emphasizes the need to transition from an aid-dependent market mechanism to a trade-heavy model.
The Role of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)
Climate mitigation is integrated into supply chains across various sectors, including plastics, food systems, and electronics. In Africa, these supply chains are largely supported by micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), many of which operate informally. A significant portion of employment in Africa occurs within these supply chains, highlighting the importance of circularity in creating livelihoods. However, many of these enterprises do not meet conventional banking criteria.
Redesigning Capital for Circular Economy Businesses
Kotamaraju suggests that Kenya can use the reduction in global funding as an opportunity to redesign capital deployment. He proposes a shift from traditional grant models to repayable or recyclable instruments, essentially zero-interest facilities linked to business milestones. Funds would be released in tranches based on performance outcomes, with capital returned to a pooled facility for redeployment to new businesses. This model has been successfully applied in food systems financing and is being explored for plastics and electronic waste.
Regulatory and Policy Considerations
Capital redesign alone is insufficient. Kotamaraju advocates for regulatory clarity and a shift from a compliance-based policy approach to an incentive framework. He suggests exploring policies that encourage participation rather than solely focusing on enforcement.
Global Capital Trends and Opportunities
Globally, patient, high-risk capital is becoming more constrained due to fiscal pressures in donor economies. Despite this trend, Kotamaraju remains optimistic, viewing the situation as an opportunity. He proposes reimagining grants to create a multiplier effect and maximize their impact.
