The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a case on January 12 concerning a decision from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The case involved interpretations of the Fair Housing Act.
The Supreme Court denied certiorari in a petition challenging the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling. The petition centered on disagreements regarding equitable tolling, disparate impact, and causation within Fair Housing Act claims.
The petition asserted that the 2nd Circuit deviated from other federal circuits by employing a “fairness-based” approach to equitable tolling in mortgage discrimination cases. This approach, according to the petition, did not necessitate plaintiffs demonstrating diligence.
The petition also contended that the 2nd Circuit’s interpretation allowed disparate impact claims to proceed based on lending practices exhibiting an “adverse or disproportionate” effect on a specific racial group. It further argued that the court did not require proof of a disproportionate effect compared to other groups.
The petition claimed the 2nd Circuit treated the “robust causality” requirement established in a prior case as non-binding.
When I was a little girl, my family visited the Santa Cruz boardwalk and nearby…
Addis Ababa, July 25, 2026 (ENA) —Information and Communication Technology (ICT) firm leaders from Ghana,…
Saturday, July 25, 2026 • 3 min read Vodacom Group executive office building displaying company…
For decades, preventing excessive bleeding after childbirth depended on a medicine that had to remain…
Ann Aluoch, former captain of the Harambee Starlets, believes that Kenya has what it takes…
A new LendingTree analysis reveals that America’s promise of opportunity remains unevenly distributed. In 2024,…